Tuesday 28 June 2011

Ex FOMC members get it...QE is BS. So why so much of it?

http://www.safehaven.com/article/21495/the-education-gap

On June 22, 2011, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) concluded a two-day meeting. This was followed by the obligatory press release. That statement was followed by a press conference featuring Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke.

CNBC, in the person of Maria Baritomo, interviewed three former FOMC members later in the day:

LEE HOSKINS, President of the Cleveland Federal Reserve branch, 1987-1991.
WILLIAM FORD, President of the Atlanta Federal Reserve branch, 1980-1983.
ROBERT HELLER, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, 1986-1989.

There was no disagreement among the three. There was one subject that all three emphasized: Simple Ben's QEII-Money-Flooding-Zero-Interest-Rate Policy (MFZIRP) has left the economy in a worse state than if he had done nothing at all.
Following are some of their comments:
LEE HOSKINS: I think the Fed is doing great damage by running negative real interest rates so long. That's a misallocation of capital.... The Fed made it real clear today they don't control employment and they don't control real GDP. They should stick with trying to control the one thing they can and that's inflation.

...

WILLIAM FORD: Nothing the Fed has done has helped positive GDP growth. It has not fixed the housing crisis by lowering rates to historic low levels. It has not promoted business investment, borrowing and spending. It's killed the dollar without helping exports a lot and that's causing inflation of import prices to go up. Most importantly, they are hurting America's elderly people by having 14 trillion of personal savings accounts of all kinds subject to interest rates that are 5 percent below where they normally are two years after the recession is over. That's costing elderly people about $300 billion. It's reduced GDP because they don't have the money to spend.

Thursday 23 June 2011

There are no accidents...ok...very few

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil tumbled 6 percent on Thursday to a four-month low after the world's top consumers released emergency oil reserves for the third time ever, a surprise intervention to aid the struggling global economy.
The International Energy Agency announced it would inject 60 million barrels of government-held stocks in the global market, immediately increasing world supply by some 2.5 percent for the next month and sending prices spiraling, with U.S. crude prices erasing all of the year's gains.
The move shocked traders who had been expecting the IEA to give top exporter Saudi Arabia more time to make up for the supply shortfall following OPEC's failed meeting on June 8, when other members blocked Gulf efforts to hike output.
"It comes after the Saudis said they would increase output so it suggests they think this might not be enough," said Helen Henton, head of commodity research for Standard Chartered Bank. "I think it will knock prices lower. I expect prices to be lower a month from now."
Goldman Sachs, whose oil price forecasts are closely watched by markets, said the release of the IEA oil could knock prices for Brent crude down by $10 to $12 a barrel.

QE3?...or QE(n)

The debate is raging. To QE or not to QE?

Bill Gross say's a form is coming. Jim Grant sees the same thing. The US economy is floundering that's after 2 version of QE. Without it this would be a modern day GREAT depression. For many americans it already is.

We need to be aware of the politics of such a move. A stealth version is my tip. "Extended period" you better believe it.


Here is what Mr Gold is saying: Meditate on these -  Thankyou Jim.

Dear Extended Family,
Today’s markets are exactly what you would expect as we enter illustration number three of the Skier.
Economic statistics are taking a hard fall.
Without QE who will buy US treasury issues?
Without QE where is the basis of world equity markets?
Without QE what do you think the chart of unemployment will look like?
Without QE how do you think the camouflage of the insolvent balance sheets of the financial industry will fare?
Without QE where is mortgage money coming from?
Without QE what do you think home prices will do?
Without QE how will the present Administration and the legislative be re-elected?
Without QE how will the States of the United States of America finance themselves?
Be prepared for a reversal of the decision to curtail QE at the end of June.
Be prepared for a snap back at a greater percentage of QE with a different name.
Be prepared for covert QE between July 1st and late August when stimulation goes wild.
Be prepared for gold to take out $1650 on the upside as magnets at $12,544 come into play.
Be prepared for the Inflationary Depression of all time.
Stand firm on your gold positions.
Stand firm on your discipline of NO margin.
Stand strong in your Swiss Franc and Canadian dollar positions.
Survive the MOPE and market manipulation that is so obvious today.
Respectfully,
Jim

http://www.jsmineset.com/2011/06/23/stand-strong/

Stealing from the people...the silent killer

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=201106211841dowjonesdjonline000414&title=change-to-inflation-measurement-on-table-as-part-of-budget-talksaides

By Corey Boles and Janet Hook
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Lawmakers are considering changing how the Consumer Price Index is calculated, a move that could save perhaps $220 billion and represent significant progress in the ongoing federal debt ceiling and deficit reduction talks.
According to congressional aides familiar with the discussions, the proposal would shift how the Consumer Price Index is calculated to reflect how people tend to change spending patterns when prices increase. For example, consumers tend to drive less when gas prices increase dramatically.
Such a move is widely seen by economists as resulting in a slower rise in inflation. That would impact an array of federal programs that are linked to CPI including the Social Security program and income tax brackets set by the federal government.
The proposal could lower federal spending by around $220 billion over the next decade, based on calculations by last year's White House deficit commission, which recommended the change as part of its final report.